Publication Date
4-2009
Description
To protect motorists and avoid tort liability, highway agencies expend considerable resources to repair damaged longitudinal barriers, such as w-beam guardrails. With limited funding available, though, highway agencies are unable to maintain all field-installed systems in the ideal as-built condition. Instead, these agencies focus on repairing only damage that has a detrimental effect on the safety performance of the barrier. The distinction between minor damage and more severe performance-altering damage, however, is not always clear. This paper presents a critical review of current United States (US) and Canadian criteria on whether to repair damaged longitudinal barrier. Barrier repair policies were obtained via comprehensive literature review and a survey of US and Canadian transportation agencies. In an analysis of the maintenance procedures of 40 US States and 8 Canadian transportation agencies, fewer than one-third of highway agencies were found to have quantitative measures to determine when barrier repair is warranted. In addition, no engineering basis for the current US barrier repair guidelines could be found. These findings underscore the importance of the development of quantitative barrier repair guidelines based on a strong technical foundation.
Journal
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume
135
Issue
4
First Page
225
Last Page
234
Department
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Link to Published Version
http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?170542
Recommended Citation
Gabauer, Doug and Gabler, Hampton C.. "Evaluation of Current Repair Criteria for Longitudinal Barrier with Crash Damage." Journal of Transportation Engineering (2009) : 225-234.